Quote:
Originally Posted by pmazz850
So, the mesh grid doesn't make contact with the electrode. it just collects the free electrons, right?
I'm going with the gas processor not the WFC.
So the water mist needs to be laser injected and the non combustible gas should be ionized, correct?
I'm thinking of making one chamber for injecting light into the water and another for ionizing the non combusibles and the electron extraction.
Am I headed in the right direction?
Can the water and the ambient air be processed in the same unit?
Sorry for all the questions. I just want to make sure I fully understand before I build a prototype.
When you speak of 125psi, is that pressure all created by the water pump or is there some kind of air pressure needed?
Also should one of the chokes for the EEC be variable?
Thank you for the help!
|
Yes, you are correct with the EEC's mesh screen grid all it does it consume freshly stripped electons from the Gas Processor. But the EEC has no choke coils. The variable choke coil you are looking at goes to the Gas Processor, but this is Stanley Meyer older designs though the EEC didn't change the VIC transformer did. In the end Stanley Meyer found it was best to match up the inductances of each bobbin cavities so each of the bobbin caivity coils in the VIC transformer hit resonance all at the same time.
In this patent:
Stanley Meyer: Water Electrolysis -- Canadian Patent # 2067735 -- Water Fule Injection System Stanley Meyer shows how the injector system he used is set up. All the gases and the water have 125 psi of presure and the ambent air gas from the outside air is primed prior to being injected through the water injector. If you take a close look at the injector you will notice that the inside electrode has a wall of 125 psi air and exhaust gases around it preventing the water from every coming into contact with electrode 8.

The part of the injector where the dielectric liquid(water) picks up it's image charge is 7a, 7b, and 8. Why Stanley Meyer gave it two numbers when it is just one piece I have no idea for 7a and 7b are the same part. And if you notice he switch the voltage zones having the outside be possitive and the inside be negetive. That part can't be true for that would lead to a direct short as the injectors replace the engines existing spark plugs and the head of the engine is grounded.

Figure 6 shows some sort of a pump control system or fuel distributer of sorts.

And in figure 2b the disc are shown take note that the ionized air gases come from disc 1, the recirculated exhause gases come from disc 2, and the water mist comes from disc 3.
Now the main reasoning for this design is to by pass any vehicals fuel system with a direct replacement system that would allow the use of his systems on many different types of engines, but it is not the only way to do this. If you obey the rules of mixing primed air gases, recirculated exhaust gases and water mist carrying a very high voltage image charge into the combustion chamber you will get the same results. Stanley Meyer's system just allowed the best way to retrofit the many different cars on the market today by fully bypassing the existing fuel system that the vehical employs.
I don't mind being ask questions for not everyone thinks like I do. But mostly I like it when people use the internet to solve their problems for it is a great teaching tool if used for that purpose. I solved this all by asking the right questions and then answering those questions. I concider myself to be as normal as everyone else, but I can't speak for everyone else on how they view this technology.
Hope this helped you out some,
h2opower.