View Single Post
Old 08-31-2016, 04:57 PM
rickoff's Avatar
rickoff rickoff is offline
Platinum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 3,343
With the 15th anniversary of September 11, 2001 events approaching, we are sure to see the same old news stories in magazines and TV specials that are designed to support the "official" story while mocking those who question that account. Interestingly, though, the 9/11 truth movement is making significant headway in its efforts to expose the "official" story for what it is. Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth are distributing a new publication titled World Trade Center Physics to 35,000 scientists and engineers during the 15th anniversary.

On the international front, the magazine of the European Physical Society, Europhysics News, has published a 3,000-word feature article by Dr. Steven Jones, Dr. Robert Korol, Tony Szamboti, and Ted Walter, entitled 15 years later: on the physics of high-rise building collapses. Europhysics News is a highly respected publication within the European physics community, and has a circulation of about 25,000 copies per issue. You can read the online version of this article here. This report exposes many holes in the "official" story, and perhaps most notably those that are found in the collapse theory proposed by Zdenek Bazant, who is recognized as the main defender of that story. Bazant is a professor of Civil Engineering and Materials Science at Northwestern University, and published a report in 2002 detailing his collapse theory. NIST accepted and pronounced that theory as being the best possible explanation for the collapse of WTC Building 7, so never adequately investigated the actual cause of Building 7's near freefall collapse into its own footprint. NIST's investigation began with the predetermined causative factor being fires, and never even considered the far more likely theory that the collapse was brought about by controlled demolition. NIST's objective was to convince the public that the "official" account of the WTC collapses was correct and indisputable, and that no evidence existed that would point to any other conclusion. More than 2,600 architects and structural engineers disagree with NIST and Bazant, and very thoroughly and convincingly explain why. This is well worth reading, and passing along to others.
"Seek wisdom by keeping an open mind to alternative realities, questioning authority, and searching for truth. Only then, when you see or hear something that has 'the ring of truth' to it, will it be as if a veil has been lifted, and suddenly you will begin to hear and see far more clearly than ever before." - Rickoff
Reply With Quote