View Single Post
 
Old 10-27-2015, 05:00 PM
frisco kid frisco kid is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 230
Woman startled to find wolves joining her morning commute; video | GrindTV.com

https://www.yahoo.com/news/disbarred...055824912.html hoax

https://www.yahoo.com/tech/wikileaks...141815829.html wikileaks

https://www.google.com/search?tbm=is...g=NCSR&imgrc=_ Open casket

Benghazi hearings: Three truths not revealed during Clinton questioning | Fox News

https://kjmemorial.wordpress.com/ Witnesses

Raw Video of Kendrick Johnson at school before his death | Video | 11alive.com Entering gym
Re-NewsIt!: CNN and Victor Blackwell play EDITED video of Kendrick Johnson in Gym

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...trump-and-you/ Socialism

http://www.tdcaa.com/node/5749

Petechiae—tiny red spots due to ruptured capillaries—are a signature injury of strangulation. At times, they may only be found under the eyelids, but they may also be found around the eyes and anywhere on the face and neck, including the victim’s scalp. Petechiae can be present in a pattern easily mistaken for a rash. Blood-red eyes, the result of ruptured capillaries in the white part of the eyes, are indicative of a “particularly vigorous struggle between the victim and assailant.”3

http://medicinembbs.blogspot.com/201...al-deaths.html

https://books.google.com/books?id=AU...phyxia&f=false PA: all cases have congestion

https://books.google.com/books?id=In...lation&f=false bleeding/mouth and nose

http://abcnews.go.com/US/toddler-sur...ry?id=29480431 Upside down baby

Subject to the jurisdiction thereof definitely includes every single person in the U.S. here for any amount of time. If you break the law you can and will be charged. If they come here illegally the government can and should deport you along with any children conceived within our borders or not. The anchor baby myth is nothing but nonsense made up by the courts, and has no bearing in reality as it pertains to the 14th amendment. No logical argument has ever been made for a child born to illegal aliens that anchors not only the child but the illegal alien parents. The claim is absurd on its face. The 14th amendment most certainly denies birthright citizenship to children born of foreign or alien parents. That is far more clear with modern immigration law.

There are no appositives in this sentence. There are four clauses and the first of which is an independent/main clause. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States. The three clauses that follow tell us more about who exactly the persons/children are, who aren't citizens at birth. No clause in the sentence replaces another clause. Most clauses, such as the three that follow are incomplete thoughts, therefore, need the main clause to make sense. The who clauses modify the noun persons.

This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wlv7rWn9ZW8 Hilarious video



Guide to the Constitution

In 1898, the Supreme Court in United States v. Wong Kim Ark declared that the Fourteenth Amendment adopted the common-law definition of birthright citizenship. Chief Justice Melville W. Fuller's dissenting opinion, however, argued that birthright citizenship had been repealed by the principles of the American Revolution and rejected by the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment. Nonetheless, the decision conferred birthright citizenship on a child of legal residents of the United States. Although the language of the majority opinion in Wong Kim Ark is certainly broad enough to include the children born in the United States of illegal as well as legal immigrants, there is no case in which the Supreme Court has explicitly held that this is the unambiguous command of the Fourteenth Amendment.

https://americanchaos.wordpress.com/...ction-thereof/

https://www.ar15.com/forums/general/...nge_/5-848891/

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2139082/posts

Therefore, it does not require a leap of faith to understand what persons, other than citizens themselves, under the Fourteenth Amendment are citizens of the United States by birth: Those aliens who have come with the intent to become U.S. citizens, who had first compiled with the laws of naturalization in declaring their intent and renounce all prior allegiances.

Sen. Trumbull further restates the the goal of the language: “It is only those persons who come completely within our jurisdiction, who are subject to our laws, that we think of making citizens…” He could only be referring to the laws of naturalization and consent to expatriation by the immigrant in order for him to come completely within the jurisdiction of the United States and its laws, i.e., he cannot be a subject of another nation.

"Birthright Citizenship": Politics v Rule of Law - Tea Party Nation

"SUBJECT TO JURISDICTION THEREOF"?

Anchor babies, birthright citizenship, and the 14th Amendment

http://www.usingenglish.com/forum/th...ositive-clause

http://www.grammar-monster.com/lesso...mma_or_not.htm That/who/commas

http://web.ku.edu/~edit/which.html

http://grammarpolice.livejournal.com...46.html?page=1 appositive/defining clause/join
http://forum.wordreference.com/threa...lause.2534945/

http://www.ello.uos.de/field.php/Syn...TGRelCNonrestr

An appositive is shorter than a relative clauses. It seems to be a derived relative clause because the wh-word and the verb be are deleted. Most appositives are derived from nonrestrictive relative clauses but there are also restrictive appositives:

This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.


http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O29...IVECLAUSE.html

http://literarydevices.net/appositive/
__________________
 

Last edited by frisco kid; 11-05-2018 at 01:23 AM.
Reply With Quote