View Single Post
Old 01-14-2015, 12:29 PM
Vinyasi's Avatar
Vinyasi Vinyasi is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 464
Quantifying Tesla's Tri-Metal Generator in terms of the 3 Gunas & 3 Doshas

It becomes easier to guess estimate what the structure of Tesla's Tri-Metal Generator is once an accurate understanding of the three gunas and their resultant three doshas is paralleled to the three metals of aluminum, copper and iron.

Here is the first draft of this presentation in audio/video format as a...
  1. Playlist of all four parts.
  2. Part One.
    3 gunas ~ 3 doshas = Tesla Tri-Metal Generator, pt-1a.mp4
  3. Part two.
    Lord Shiva ~ Tamas = Iron, pt-1b.mp4
  4. Part three.
    3 gunas ~ 3 doshas = Tesla Tri-Metal Generator, pt-2.m4a
  5. Part four.
    Schematically Outlining Tesla Tri-Metal Generator, pt-3.m4a
The three gunas and the three doshas of Ayur Veda are axiomatic to an understanding of Creation at its most fundamental level of operation. Understand this conceptual framework, and its application of Tesla's Generator will become universal to any other application outside of any attempt to replicate his generator precisely the way it may have been done by the Germans during WWII.

Sattwa is the essential nature of Lord Brahma, the Creator.
Sattwa is purity.

Rajas is the essential nature of Lord Vishnu, the Maintainer/Sustainer.
Rajas is pressure born of the friction/heat wherein the two opposites of Sattwa and Tamas combine.

Tamas is the essential nature of Lord Shiva, the Destroyer.
Tamas is destruction, and also inertia and decay.
Shiva is also the destroyer of destruction, namely: the removal of blockage. Thus, He is the ultimate liberator.

These three gunas of sattwa, rajas and tamas operate upon each other creating an interplay of harmonics known as the three doshas. These three doshas do not exist as causation, but as the effect of the three gunas. Each of the three gunas are best arranged as the vertices of a conceptual triangle. Draw another triangle inverted to the first and place the three doshas onto the vertices of the second triangle such that: kapha dosha is in between tamas and sattwa, vata is in between rajas and sattwa, and place pitta in between rajas and tamas. So, at twelve o'clock is sattwa...

  1. 12:00 is sattwa
  2. {2:00 is kapha}
  3. 4:00 is tamas
  4. {6:00 is pitta}
  5. 8:00 is rajas
  6. {10:00 is vata}

I've placed the three doshas in {brackets} to indicate that they don't really exist except as an after-effect of the three gunas. Notice that the destructive fire of pitta (which aids the digestive breakdown of food) stands in between the active friction/heat/fire/passion of rajas and the destructive quality of tamas. And the airy, fairy light-headed head-tripping vata stands in between rajas and the purity of sattwa. Kapha is a blend of opposites not unlike rajas which stands diametrically opposite to kapha on this conceptually hexagonal wheel.

Purusha is the unmanifest, the fourth guna. Since there is no actual fourth guna, yet something has to represent the nadir of a wave opposite rajas at the zenith, so the unmanifest represents itself as a stand-in for itself: the fourth guna - the transcendental source of all of the other three gunas.

When a wave of manifestation undergoes change, it happens when it is least likely to be noticed or opposed: at the nadir of existence. Only when existence rises up again to the zenith of the next wave of manifestation will change be appreciated by its comparison to the zenith of the prior wave. Thus, it is easiest to transcend the relative and experience the source of existence during the nadir of existence. Not that there is any guarantee that transcendence happens during each and every nadir, but that it is more likely to do so then.

Nadirs are funny things. There's nothing absolute about them. They can happen at any time, even at a so-called zenith. It depends on what quality is being quantified. Since there are many qualities of a wave of manifestation at any point in time, transcending or manifesting is a complex and delicate affair despite its simple appearance.

If iron embodies tamas, then it should quiet a restive vata - its diametric opposite.

If copper embodies sattwa, then it should quiet a fiery pitta by giving it a place to circulate.

And if aluminum embodies rajas, then it should stimulate a lazy-bones kapha.

Now, for the juicy part...

~~~~~ Tesla's Special Tri-Metal DC/AC Generator ~~~~~

A reciprocating aluminum piston - vibrates no more than 1/16 of an inch (according to William Lyne in his "Pentagon Aliens" book, pages 283-286) - within a copper tube driven by compressed air which is stored as liquified air in tanks on board U-boats retrofitted with electric drive motors.

To each end of the copper tube is connected a copper clad aluminum wire (CCA wire), and this copper clad wire is wound around the copper tube. So essentially, this copper wire connects with itself forming a circular loop using the copper tube as an insert. There is also a pair of parallel connections coming off of the copper wire which can switch in a load, such as: the electric motor driving this Electro-U Boat plus all of its other loads.

The two ends of this copper tube are sealed with two aluminum plugs at each end. The CCA wire is connected congruent to each end of the copper tube such that the: aluminum core of the CCA wire is congruent with the aluminum plug at each end of the otherwise hollow copper tube, and the copper clad film layered on the surface of the CCA's aluminum core is congruent with the copper tube. So in a sense, the copper clad layer running along the surface of the CCA wire is an extension of the copper tube, and the aluminum core of the CCA wire is an extension of the aluminum plug on each end of the copper hollow tube, but is also a semi-extension of the aluminum piston reciprocating inside the hollow copper tube.

The CCA wire made especially for today's automobile audio systems is relevant to this imagined scenario since I still believe that at its heart, this generator of Tesla's is essentially an electrostatic AC audio system creating a crisp, clean signal so clear of distortion that it can theoretically be amplified to any degree of wattage.

So far, we have what looks like it could be an analog AC signal generator driving an electric field surrounding it?

So next, comes its amplification...

By itself, this is still not bad...

Starting with one pair of horseshoe permanent magnets, they are positioned along opposing sides of the copper tube (already wound with CCA wire along most of its length) such that each pole of each horseshoe magnet is at one or the other end of the copper tube and the poles of the two magnets are directly facing each other on opposite sides of the tube. Furthermore, one end of the copper tube has exclusively positioned there only north poles of both horseshoe magnets. The other end of the copper tube has only south pole magnets. So, at either end of the copper tube is a face-off of repulsive magnetic force making this copper tube into a permanently magnetized dipole.

Maybe the two ends of the copper tube is bare of wire so that the magnetic poles of whatever quantity of horseshoe pairs can easily be positioned as close as possible to the outer surface of the tube?

As the reciprocating piston does its thing, back and forth, it alternately oscillates between either north or south polar magnetic fields, respectively.

The pair of horseshoe magnets may be increased in sets of two (two, four, six, eight, etc), or else by exponential powers of two (two, four, eight, sixteen, etc)? I don't know which, or if it makes a difference...

Amplification wouldn't be complete without a means employed to suck off excess magnetic field, nay, all magnetic field generated by the permanent horseshoe magnets. This is where it gets interesting...

What would you say if it were possible to generate an electric field using permanent magnets? Would you say that I'm crazy? Of course not. That's done all the time in electric motors usually comprising either the rotor or else the stator... But, here, the method employed for accomplishing this is a little unique...

Since iron is an inexpensive and relatively efficient magnetic shield material, and since this magnetic shielding is not reflective, but is absorptive, the shielding material will act as a wave guide taking whatever direction the magnetic field would have been and guiding it along the entire geometry of the iron structure. So...

We take the hull of a German U-Boat, or the chassis of Tesla's Generator, and connect either iron shell to the crest of each horseshoe magnet opposite its north and south pole ends. Why?

To cart off the very magnetic field which the permanent magnets are - by nature - expected to produce. What happens if a magnetic field is removed? An electric field results! Generated by permanent magnets of all things! More iron attached to the crest of the horseshoe magnets means more removal of the magnetic field which they so desperately are trying to produce. More removal of magnetism, more intense will be the electric field. This is counter-intuitive to first do the opposite of what you want to eventually produce, and then invert it.

Think of thermal solar collector panels on a roof. Lot's of sunshine. Without a heat pump, those collectors will quickly reach saturation and the excess sunlight will just bounce its heat right off of those collectors out into the sky.

So, by removal of magnetic fields produced by all of these permanent horseshoe magnets (the more magnets, the merrier), the more intense will be the electric field which we are already trying to produce with the CCA winding. That's why lots of iron is needed: to act as a sink for all of that magnetic field generated by the permanent magnets, plus any magnetism which they absorb from the CCA winding.

We want an electric field, 'cuz we're powering an electric load. But we want to use iron to amplify the effect. So, iron is the last layer to this tri-metal four-layered sandwich with aluminum at its center, followed by copper, penultimately followed by permanent magnets, and finished off by an outer layer of iron.


Last edited by Vinyasi; 01-17-2015 at 02:13 AM. Reason: replaced a word & added two graphics
Reply With Quote