View Single Post
 
Old 12-26-2014, 10:41 PM
Vinyasi Vinyasi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 323
Uh-Huh...

Quote:
Originally Posted by tutanka View Post
No need magic books or high voltage for obtain an working Meyer device.. all informations are wrong for preserve the secret .. all patents informations are not correct for not obtain working results. Water can be dissociated simply and use in a burner or engine.
  1. I need not ever quote Meyer if I want to preach to non-believers.
  2. Fortunately for us, Herman Anderson has never been affiliated with Stanley Meyer. Thank God for another independent researcher.
  3. I have quoted online resources, above, having no association with either fellow.
  4. I need not preach to the choir.
  5. This refutes perpetual motion claims.
  6. What on Earth would I want with reading Stanley's patents? If it can't be explained in general terms, then it's a wash.
  7. The only time I'd need to read a patent is whenever two plus two equals something other than four.
  8. I do not consider science to be magic. If there's an easier way, then great! But it's never easy discussing this topic with a non-believer. So, a technicality of electro-chemistry is invoked - not necessarily to make it happen, but - to confirm the possibility in the mind of the doubter. Baby steps!
  9. Water has nothing to do with my statements. The hydrogen could be stored in tanks for all I care. My only premise for pursuing this line of hypothetical reasoning is: How can electro-chemistry favor the production of ammonia on the fly from hydrogen and air? That is all...
  10. Thanks for clarifying my incomplete treatise.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote