View Single Post
 
Old 10-17-2013, 03:41 AM
rickoff's Avatar
rickoff rickoff is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 3,343
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomeyes View Post
Silverstein has lost a lot of money because of 9/11 and still continues to lose money. He's been paying rent for 12 years on a property that makes him zero income.
Do you seriously believe what you are saying? Silverstein and two other investors made a down payment of just $124 million on the WTC complex just six weeks before the buildings were destroyed. In 2003, as reported in The New York Times, Larry and his pals reached a deal on a return of about $98 million of their original investment of $124 million. The deal was also reported in California's MontereyHerald. [MontereyHerald 11/22/2003]

Besides getting back roughly 80% of the original investment, Larry made a very hefty profit on the insurance claims that he filed. As reported by Forbes.com on December 6, 2004, "A federal jury on Monday ruled that the assault on the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center was in fact two occurrences for insurance purposes. The finding in U.S. District Court in Manhattan means leaseholder Larry Silverstein may collect up to $4.6 billion, according to reports." [Forbes.com 12/06/04]

Greedy Larry also attempted to sue both American and United Airlines for allowing their planes to be flown into his buildings, and when that was unsuccessfuul then attempted to sue the insurance company for amounts the company had been able to collect from the airlines.

The original deal was a 99 year, $3.2 billion lease. That breaks down to 32 million a year, and here we are at 12 years after 9/11. Even if Larry continued to make the full scheduled payments over this 12 year period, which I seriously doubt that the Port Authority (owner of the buildings) forced him to do, that would amount to only $384 million, which is just 1/12 of his insurance scam payout. Larry had actually taken out insurance policies on the WTC with dozens of insurance companies, a fact which the Associated Press (AP) reported in 2007.

9/11 was no doubt the biggest scam in all of history, and Larry's part in it is very clear. After all, Larry admitted on videotape that he gave the order to "pull" WTC Building 7. That is a term which demolition experts use when referring to an intentional, planned demolition of a building. Later, when Larry realized he shouldn't have admitted that, he tried to convince us that what he really meant was to pull the firemen out of Building 7 as there had already been much loss of life. That explanation was pure hogwash, however, because the fire chief had earlier reported that the firemen had all left the building several hours before it collapsed.

Building 7 was not hit by a plane, and suffered only minor fire damage, but collapsed at free fall speed in a classic controlled demolition pattern. It was one of only three steel framed buildings ever to collapse for a stated reason of fire damage. The other two were the WTC Twin Towers. More than 2,000 architects and engineers agree that the "official" story of 9/11 is a farce. Don't you think it is high time that we had a real, and independent investigation into the events of 9/11/2001, and that the real players in this farce, including Larry, Bush, Cheney, and others, should be held accountable?

To see the latest news on what's new on 9/11, go here.
__________________
"Seek wisdom by keeping an open mind to alternative realities, questioning authority, and searching for truth. Only then, when you see or hear something that has 'the ring of truth' to it, will it be as if a veil has been lifted, and suddenly you will begin to hear and see far more clearly than ever before." - Rickoff

Last edited by rickoff; 10-17-2013 at 03:54 AM.
Reply With Quote