View Single Post
  #788 (permalink)  
Old 04-30-2008, 04:51 PM
Peter Lindemann Peter Lindemann is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Liberty Lake, Washington
Posts: 491
No offense taken

Quote:
Originally Posted by lighty View Post
Your friends are correct in their line of thought. Why should they accept your assertions without any material proof? I personally don't have problem accepting the fact that Peter's approach to energy recovery is sound and possible, especially in the light of the fact that I personally tested various systems that use fundamental paradigm as his recovery system does. However, I still hold my final thought on the subject to a moment when I see exact measurement of net electrical input vs net mechanical output that Jetijs will soon provide. Reasonably skeptical mind is something one has to cherish if one is to filter out all the garbage found on net. Some of the theories people put out are well intended and theoretically sound but they don't work as intended.

That being said I do think that Peter's system is well on it's way to show predicted results. I just like to see concrete measurements. No offense Peter.
Lighty,

I'm with you! There is no substitute for concrete measurements. Also, reasonable skepticism is necessary if you are not to be taken in by all manner of wild claims. I have "believed" in this motor since I first thought it up in 1983. I have a friend who has modeled this motor in a special computer program and the results of this analysis are positive and support COP>1 operation. So, my confidence is very high, but like you, I will be glad to "know" it works after Jetijs tests his model.

Thank you for helping make this project a GLOBAL, cooperative effort! I could not have done it all here, by myself.

Peter
Reply With Quote