Quote:
Originally Posted by Redmeanie
Stephen,
You are right on......I could not have explained it better! I started to earlier but as you can see by my previous post I edited, I just didn't have the time. Some people just don't take into consideration "ALL" the things at play here and that under certain circumstances things don't work the way that they are "Meant" to and that you can manipulate "What" they do by changing their original settings or positions.
Oh well you know how it is....Some people just Can't Think Outside the box and just love to shoot things down before they know the "Whole" Picture. 
 |
I agree that 'thinking outside the box' is the key to going beyond these outdated technologies!
Regardless of all the exciting alternative views out there, the technologies that make it to production in virtually all fields are essentially already outdated and in the process of being replaced by what 'they' are researching and engineering in the lab. In electronics, the new products are often already on the shelf! Thus, all boxes are inside other boxes inside other boxes - or in Russia, they might say dolls within dolls lol.
I prefer to try and assume the stance of Socrates who said 'I am the smartest man in the world - I know nothing'!
Even the very explanation that I gave is likely completely wrong to what is actually going on with electron 'flow' considering the many sensible explanations of the interaction with the aether of potential states (high/low) that have been discussed elsewhere on this forum.
I appreciate biggs' comments as they really got me to think about the classical explanation of O2 sensors, thus clearing out a few cobwebs. I hope biggs comes back with some new ideas to challenge or add to those posted here ,for by all of us, we might really get somewhere!
In the end, I highly suspect we will find there never was a box to 'think' out of lol.
In Peace,
tephen