I remember somewhere it was mentioned that Tesla was able to heat and cool with the same circuit, after some one had argued that you cannot heat and cool at the same time.
In Arizona, we all are painfully aware of how much of a power hog AC units are. Comfort comes at a price and with prices going up it just makes sense that creating economical cooling will go a long way. If that cooling also produces energy instead of consuming it.. Hell might even be able to afford to freeze over.

[/quote]
Howdee,
I'm in the HVAC industry. I think you're barking up the wrong tree with the negative energy search for cooling. Ideally, A/C should be able to transfer 7Xs the heat out of your living space to that which is consumed by the condensing unit. The problem is you are trying to dump the heat into a heat saturated environment, which is why the ground source heat pumps work so much better. And normal A/C units can't keep up in the summer; more heat to move; less cool air to move it to; electric companies dropping the voltage trying to make it stretch.
I believe you would find an easier improvement to your efficiency by building one of Peter's super motors and hooking it to a belt drive compressor. Unless your negative energy is absorbing tremendous quantities of heat it will be wisked away by the warm breezes of Arizona and you'll be left holding a damp wire.
But, hey, I could very easily be wrong. So, don't let me discourage you. My knowledge about negative energy is nearly in the negative.
Live clean and prosper,
Mark Evans