Quote:
Originally Posted by adam ant
thanks for the post Stephen.
a few things about the Two point that isnt exactly clear in the book...
1. page 93-94 talks about measuring your two points. but it isnt clear if it is an automatic quantum measurement, or if you are to mentally count 1, 2 , 3 inches/feet etc.
2. are you supposed to associate each point with something or is it simply "Two points"? for example, do you say "point one is my bad shoulder, and point two represents a fixed shoulder"?
3. the Doc talks about focusing intent, but later says to do "nothing". this isnt really clarified in the book, maybe you can help. when you find point one, and then find point two, and then entangle them, are you mentally stating what results you want? or are you completely leaving it open to the universe?
Example: i have blurry vision. i have been trying to Two point that problem but to no avail. i find my first point on my temple, and then entangle it to another point on my opposite temple with a rubber band or a beam of lazer light. i mentally count the space between the points(about 6 inches) and then mentally think "clear my vision"... but im not sure what to do after this.
also, i have already had strange successes with both Two pointing and Busting loose. but the other day i was trying to work on some traffic. ironically every point of the trip resulted in strategically placed obstacles that made the trip longer than ANY previous along this route. i was getting very frustrated, and now since that day (three days ago) i seem to have hit a block, where im getting NO results at all with either ME or BL.
what do you think? my imagination is second to none, so i know that isnt the problem. i feel confident about "letting go" and i can also blank my mind pretty easy and fast. but for some reason im having trouble reaching that Quantum Mind state.
any help would be greatly appreciated.
bryan
|
Jure has given a stellar reply post to your questions!!!
I will just answer your basic questions as well.
1) Two-pointing: Quantum or literal measurement?
Two pointing is not 'locked-in' as any one thing. It is unique to each individual. For example, the actual measurement of distance is not important, but if counting off and observing the distance helps you connect the two points, then that works for you! In the end, its my opinion that its simply the act of consciousness observing two points in space-time that sets up the state of being in 'waveform consciousness' where infinite playful possiblities exists! As I've mentioned in previous posts, the two-point can be done virtually, can be done with two points you 'make up', not just percieved as physical sticky, hard, soft places. The 'sticky, hard, soft' places are just intuitive 'knowingness' in your awareness in that case. But, the physical two-point is a good place to begin as practice reveals many other levels to this.
2) Are you supposed to associate two-points with particular areas?
Again, I will reemphasize that there is no 'supposed to' with M.E. Kindly take your left-brain that wishes to 'understand' through logic, procedure and rational thought, and put it away when you put your M.E. cap on!
If you remember from the book, labeling something as a 'bad shoulder' is entering into the problem set. There is no shoulder there anyways. It is only a patter of information - photons. The solution set does not see a sore shoulder or any shoulder at all. Our bodies and all physical manifestations are only patterns of information stored in the Matrix and for us is to step out of consensus, material-world reality, and into a place where the infinite choices of how the waveform may collapse. Through intention, we 'weight' a new possiblity which becomes an ever-increasing Probability of occuring.
3) Intent, Letting Go, Stating what you want, Leaving it up to the Universe?
The answer is all of the above. Intent is a sacred space of trusting that the best highest good will occur. Being aware of both the 'situation before you', say the previous 'sore shoulder' and at the same time allowing for a completely different outcome is a lot like 'stating what you want', without the dialogue, isn't it? In the end, it is your trust in the Power of the Universe that
wants to effect a shift that will do the actual work. That is the part at the end of the M.E. session that has to do with 'letting go'. This is where you go to a 'no-place' and allow the shift to happen.
There are several reasons why you might have a bunch of success and then none, but the basic reply I can think of is that this is not a technique based upon imagination or intellectual understanding. Imagination plays very little role as in the vivid mental imagery kind that is derived by consciously creating pictures in our head, but open-ended questions like 'what would it look like to see clearly Now?' are much more effective.
There is no replacement for going to the seminar. Rarely are people able to truly 'get this' by just reading the book. That is not the purpose of the book, to teach M.E. without the seminars. However, the book
does open up immense new worlds of possiblity and fun for those who it resonates with.
Thanks again for your questions!
In gratitude!
tephen